Court fight over Ohio executions likely to focus on sedative
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed1fb/ed1fbe36dd8797b368b9f831dd9f0c21395d3d93" alt=""
Legal Outlook - POSTED: 2016/10/08 15:35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed1fb/ed1fbe36dd8797b368b9f831dd9f0c21395d3d93" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4390/f43909581e88439eb1bfc2fed3e0f482c8039f3f" alt=""
Ohio says it's resuming executions in January with a three-drug protocol similar to one it used for several years.
The concept is one adopted for decades by many states: the first drug sedates inmates, the second paralyzes them, and the third stops their hearts.
The key difference comes with the first drug the state plans to use, midazolam (mih-DAY'-zoh-lam), which has been challenged in court as unreliable.
The state argues that a planned dose of 500 milligrams will ensure that inmates are properly sedated.
Defense attorneys say it's unclear what a much bigger dose would achieve.
Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that midazolam can be used in executions without violating the Eighth Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.