Jury deadlock in California Vioxx case leads to mistrial
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed1fb/ed1fbe36dd8797b368b9f831dd9f0c21395d3d93" alt=""
Breaking Legal News - POSTED: 2007/01/20 17:45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed1fb/ed1fbe36dd8797b368b9f831dd9f0c21395d3d93" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4390/f43909581e88439eb1bfc2fed3e0f482c8039f3f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb04a/cb04a453ee311487b19ed32f5d6dfb62a75b62ec" alt=""
Vioxx manufacturer Merck Pharmaceuticals, which withdrew the drug from the market in 2004 after research showed it doubled the risk of heart attacks and strokes, claimed that the men's heart problems were caused by pre-existing coronary heart disease, and not the drug. After the mistrial was declared, Merck announced that the plaintiffs did not prove their cases, and that they were ready to defend against the allegations if they were brought fourth again. As of the end of last November, Merck faced 27,200 lawsuits over Vioxx and another 265 potential state-based class-action lawsuits. A federal judge rejected national class-action lawsuits in federal court early in November.