However, the added complexity of the trade war sparked by U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum poses a fresh challenge. For Ukraine, which heavily depends on its steel industry, this could further destabilize an already fragile economy. The 25% tariffs introduced by President Trump could lead to decreased exports, exacerbating the economic strain caused by the war. In addition, Trump's recent outreach to Putin and comments about potentially meeting with him in person, coupled with dismissals of NATO membership for Ukraine, raise concerns in Kyiv about the future of U.S. support.

These developments underscore how deeply interconnected geopolitics, military conflict, and global trade are in shaping the survival of Ukraine's key industries. The factory’s workers, like many others in the region, are caught in the crossfire of these broader international shifts, and their resilience will be critical in navigating both the physical and economic battles ahead.

by breakinglegalnews.com

The use of a U.S. military plane for the deportation marked a shift in procedure, as the Trump administration had previously relied on commercial and chartered flights for such actions. This new method of using military planes drew attention due to the reports of the shackling, particularly because it involved long periods of restraint.

Indian lawmakers, including Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, called the treatment inhumane, displaying placards and chanting slogans in Parliament. They demanded an explanation from the Indian government and called for dignity and humane treatment for the deportees. Gandhi posted on social media, emphasizing that Indians deserved better than handcuffs.

In response, India's External Affairs Minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, stated that the U.S. regulations on restraints had been in place since 2012. He clarified that women and children were not restrained and that the procedures used during the flight were consistent with past practices. Jaishankar also highlighted that India’s focus should be on addressing the issue of illegal migration, which has led to an uptick in arrests along the U.S.-Canada border, particularly among migrants from Punjab and Gujarat.

Despite the protests, the Indian government has maintained that while it opposes illegal immigration, it does not object to the deportations. The controversy continues, particularly with Prime Minister Modi’s upcoming visit to Washington, where discussions on immigration are expected to continue.

by breakinglegalnews.com

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing significant challenges after the U.S. decision to withdraw from the U.N. health agency, as highlighted during a recent meeting where global leaders and diplomats urged the U.S. to reverse this move. The WHO relies heavily on U.S. funding, and with the U.S. contributing an estimated $988 million for 2024-2025—around 14% of its total budget—there are growing concerns about how the agency will manage without this vital financial support.

The U.S. contribution plays a central role in funding WHO’s health emergencies program, including efforts in regions like the Middle East, Ukraine, and Sudan. The U.S. also finances a significant portion of the WHO’s tuberculosis work in Europe, Africa, and the Western Pacific. The withdrawal of these funds has left WHO scrambling to address the shortfall, with warnings that critical programs such as polio-eradication and HIV treatment may suffer as a result.

At a recent budget meeting, Germany's envoy, Bjorn Kummel, expressed urgency, saying, "The roof is on fire, and we need to stop the fire as soon as possible." Meanwhile, WHO has struggled to collect owed funds from the U.S. for 2024, leaving the agency facing a deficit as it continues to operate without full financial backing.

The situation is expected to remain a topic of discussion through WHO's executive board session, running until February 11, with health ministers from around the world determining the next steps to address the funding gap left by the U.S. withdrawal.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for promoting global health, coordinating international health efforts, and setting standards for public health practices. Its mission is to ensure that all people, regardless of their location, have access to the highest possible level of health and well-being.

WHO's main functions include:

1. Providing leadership on global health matters and shaping the health research agenda.
2. Setting international health standards and regulations, such as guidelines on vaccinations, disease control, and food safety.
3. Coordinating responses to health emergencies like outbreaks of diseases (e.g., Ebola, COVID-19).
4. Supporting countries in strengthening their health systems, preventing diseases, and improving health outcomes through technical assistance, training, and funding.
5. Monitoring and assessing global health trends, like tracking disease outbreaks and assessing health risks worldwide.

WHO is funded by contributions from its member states, and it works with countries, governments, health experts, and partners globally to achieve its health goals.

[Image credit: Pexel]

On Friday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio engaged in a significant phone conversation with China's top diplomat, Wang Yi. This dialogue marks an important step in shaping the diplomatic relations between the United States and China under the new Donald Trump administration. Here's a breakdown of the key points and their potential implications:

1. Prioritizing American Interests:
   • Statement: Rubio emphasized that the Trump administration will prioritize American interests above all else.
   • Implication: This signals a shift towards a more unilateral approach in foreign policy, focusing primarily on benefits and advantages for the U.S., potentially affecting global alliances and trade relationships.
2. Concerns Over China's Actions:
   • Areas Highlighted: Taiwan and the South China Sea.
   • Implication: The U.S. continues to express apprehension regarding China's territorial claims and military activities in these regions. This stance reinforces Washington's commitment to maintaining freedom of navigation and supporting Taiwan's sovereignty, which could lead to heightened tensions if not managed carefully.
3. Commitment to Indo-Pacific Allies:
   • Statement: Rubio underscored Washington's dedication to its allies in the Indo-Pacific region.
   • Implication: Strengthening alliances in this strategic area is crucial for counterbalancing China's growing influence. It suggests potential increased military cooperation, economic partnerships, and joint initiatives to ensure regional stability.
4. Managing Bilateral Differences:
   • Chinese Response: Wang Yi acknowledged the need to manage differences between the two largest economies.
   • Implication: Despite existing tensions, there is an acknowledgment from both sides of the necessity to maintain communication channels. This could pave the way for negotiations on trade, technology exchange, and other critical issues.
5. Economic Measures and Trade Tariffs:
   • U.S. Actions: Trump has indicated readiness to impose an additional 10% tariff on Chinese products starting February 1.
   • Implication: Increased tariffs could escalate the ongoing trade war, impacting global supply chains, increasing costs for consumers, and potentially leading to retaliatory measures from China.
6. Potential High-Level Meetings:
   • Trump's Hope: There is an expressed desire for a meeting between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping.
   • Implication: High-level dialogues are essential for de-escalating tensions and negotiating agreements on contentious issues. Such meetings could lead to breakthroughs or, conversely, exacerbate disagreements depending on the discussions' outcomes.

Secretary Rubio's conversation with Wang Yi underscores a period of cautious engagement between the U.S. and China. While the Trump administration emphasizes American interests and expresses concerns over China's regional activities, there remains a mutual recognition of the need to manage bilateral differences. The balance between asserting national priorities and maintaining open communication channels will be pivotal in shaping the future dynamics of U.S.-China relations. Additionally, the potential imposition of further tariffs and the possibility of high-level meetings indicate that economic and diplomatic strategies will continue to play significant roles in this bilateral relationship.

by breakinglegalnews.com

In a significant legal development, a federal judge has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship. This executive order sought to redefine the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause, which grants citizenship to all individuals born on U.S. soil. The order specifically targeted children born to undocumented immigrants and those on temporary visas.

On January 23, 2025, U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour, appointed by President Reagan, issued a temporary restraining order, labeling the executive action as "blatantly unconstitutional." This decision came in response to lawsuits filed by several states and civil rights organizations, which argued that the order violated the 14th Amendment.

The 14th Amendment clearly states that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." Legal experts have long interpreted this to mean that anyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of their parents' immigration status, is automatically granted citizenship. The Supreme Court reinforced this interpretation in the 1898 case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, affirming that the Constitution grants birthright citizenship to almost all children born in the United States.

His appearance at the Seoul Western District Court triggered chaotic scenes in nearby streets, where thousands of his fervent supporters rallied for hours calling for his release. They clashed with police, who detained around 40 protesters including about 20 who climbed over a fence in an attempt to approach the court. At least two vehicles carrying anti-corruption investigators were damaged as they left the court after arguing for Yoon’s arrest.

Yoon has been in detention since he was apprehended on Wednesday in a massive law enforcement operation at his residence. He faces potential rebellion charges linked to his declaration of martial law on Dec. 3, which set off the country’s most serious political crisis since its democratization in the late 1980s.

The Corruption Investigation Office for High-Ranking Officials, which is leading a joint investigation with police and the military, requested the Seoul Western District Court to grant a warrant for Yoon’s formal arrest.

Yoon’s lawyers said he spoke for about 40 minutes to the judge during the nearly five-hour closed-door hearing. His legal team and anti-corruption agencies presented opposing arguments about whether he should be held in custody. The lawyers did not share his specific comments.

The judge is expected to make a decision by late Saturday or early Sunday. Yoon’s motorcade was seen leaving the court Saturday evening for the detention center, where Yoon will await the decision.

If Yoon is arrested, investigators can extend his detention to 20 days, during which they will transfer the case to public prosecutors for indictment. If the court rejects the investigators’ request, Yoon will be released and return to his residence.

Yoon was transported to the court from a detention center in Uiwang, near Seoul, in a blue Justice Ministry van escorted by police and the presidential security service.

The motorcade entered the court’s basement parking space as thousands of Yoon’s supporters gathered in nearby streets despite a heavy police presence. Some protesters broke through the police lines and tapped on the windows of his van approaching the court. Yoon did not speak to reporters.

After its investigators were attacked by protesters, the anti-corruption agency asked media companies to obscure the faces of its members attending the hearing.

It hadn’t been clear until Saturday morning whether Yoon would choose to attend the hearing. Defense lawyers met Yoon at the detention center and he accepted his legal team’s advice to appear personally before the judge, said Yoon Kab-keun, one of the president’s lawyers. The lawyer said the president was to argue that his decree was a legitimate exercise of his powers and that accusations of rebellion would not hold up before a criminal court or the Constitutional Court, which is reviewing whether to formally remove him from office or reinstate him.

Nine people, including Yoon’s defense minister, police chief, and several top military commanders, have already been arrested and indicted for their roles in the enforcement of martial law.

The crisis began when Yoon, in an attempt to break through legislative gridlock, imposed military rule and sent troops to the National Assembly and election offices. The standoff lasted only hours after lawmakers who managed to get through a blockade voted to lift the measure. The opposition-dominated assembly voted to impeach him on Dec. 14.

If Yoon is formally arrested, it could mark the beginning of an extended period in custody for him, lasting months or more.

If prosecutors indict Yoon on rebellion and abuse of power charges, which are the allegations now being examined by investigators, they could keep him in custody for up to six months before trial.

Under South Korean law, orchestrating a rebellion is punishable by life imprisonment or the death penalty.  Yoon’s lawyers have argued that there is no need to detain him during the investigation, saying he doesn’t pose a threat to flee or destroy evidence.

A court in southeastern Bangladesh on Thursday rejected a plea for bail by a jailed Hindu leader who led large rallies in the Muslim-majority country demanding better security for minority groups.

Krishna Das Prabhu, 39, faces sedition charges after he led huge rallies in the southeastern city of Chattogram. Hindu groups say there have been thousands of attacks against Hindus since early August, when the secular government of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was overthrown.

Prabhu didn’t appear at the hearing, during which Chattogram Metropolitan Sessions Judge Saiful Islam rejected the bail plea, according to Public Prosecutor Mofizul Haque Bhuiyan. Security was tight, with police and soldiers guarding the court.

“He faces serious charges like sedition and others involving the security and sovereignty of our country,” Bhuiyan told The Associated Press by phone. “We argued in the court that if he gets bail it could create anarchy as we saw in the past that he triggered violence on the court premises by calling thousands of his supporters to protest.

“So, we moved against his bail plea as we believed that he could misuse his bail.”

Apurba Kumar Bhattacharjee, a lawyer representing Prabhu, said that they would appeal the decision.

The court rejected an earlier request for bail made while Prabhu didn’t have lawyers. Lawyers who sought to represent him at that hearing said they were threatened or intimidated, and many of them are facing charges related to the death of a Muslim lawyer during clashes outside the court when Prabhu appeared there shortly after being arrested in Bangladesh’s capital, Dhaka, in November.

For Thursday’s hearing, 11 lawyers traveled from Dhaka, arriving and leaving with a security escort.

Hindu groups and other minority groups in Bangladesh and abroad have criticized the interim government led by Nobel peace laureate Muhammad Yunus for undermining their security. Yunus and his supporters said that reports of attacks on Hindus and other groups since August have been exaggerated.

Prabhu’s arrest came as tensions spiked following reports of the desecration of the Indian flag in Bangladesh, with some burning it and others laying it on the floor for people to step on. Protesters in India responded in kind.

Prabhu is a spokesman for the Bangladesh Sammilito Sanatan Jagaran Jote group. He was also associated with the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, widely known as the Hare Krishna movement.

Radharamn Das, vice president and spokesman of the group in Kolkata, the capital of India’s West Bengal state, told the television station India Today that Prabhu’s health is deteriorating.

A South Korean court issued warrants Tuesday to detain impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol and search his office and residence over allegations of rebellion in connection with his short-lived declaration of martial law.

It’s the first time a warrant has been issued to detain a sitting South Korean president. But experts say there is little chance of detention or searches unless Yoon is formally removed from office.

The Seoul Western District Court issued warrants to detain Yoon and to search the presidential office and residence in central Seoul, according to a statement from the Corruption Investigation Office for High-Ranking Officials, which is leading a joint investigation with police and military authorities.

The agency says it’s been investigating whether Yoon’s Dec. 3 declaration amounted to rebellion. Under South Korean law, the leader of a rebellion can face the death penalty or life imprisonment if convicted. Yoon has presidential immunity from most criminal prosecutions, but the privilege does not extend to allegations of rebellion or treason.

Yoon’s powers have been suspended since the opposition-controlled National Assembly voted to impeach him on Dec. 14 over his imposition of martial law, during which hundreds of troops and police officers were deployed at the assembly. By law, a president in South Korea is allowed to declare martial law only during wartime or similar emergencies and has no right to suspend parliament’s operations even under martial law.

Yoon has argued his decree was a legitimate act of governance, calling it a warning to the main liberal opposition Democratic Party — which he has called “a monster” and “anti-state forces” — that has used its legislative majority to impeach top officials, undermine the government’s budget, and which he claims sympathizes with North Korea.

The Constitutional Court is to determine whether to dismiss Yoon as president or reinstate him. Experts said Yoon is likely to ignore the warrants. He’s already dodged repeated requests by investigative authorities to appear for questioning, and the presidential security service has blocked attempts to search his office and residence citing a law that bans raids on sites with state secrets.

Yoon Kap-keun, a lawyer for the president, called the detainment warrant “invalid” and “illegal,” saying the anti-corruption agency lacks legal authority to investigate rebellion charges. The presidential security service said it will provide security to Yoon in accordance with the law.

The anti-corruption agency said it has no immediate plans on when it would proceed with the warrants.

South Korean law enforcement officials requested a court warrant on Monday to detain impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol as they investigate whether his short-lived martial law decree on Dec. 3 amounted to rebellion.

The Corruption Investigation Office for High-Ranking Officials, which leads a joint investigation with police and military authorities into the power grab that lasted only a few hours, confirmed it requested the warrant from the Seoul Western District Court. They plan to question Yoon on charges of abuse of authority and orchestrating a rebellion.

Yoon Kap-keun, the president’s lawyer, denounced the detention attempt and filed a challenge with the same court, arguing that the warrant request was invalid. He also claimed the anti-corruption agency lacked the legal authority to investigate rebellion charges. Still, he evaded answering how the legal team would respond if the court approved the warrant for the president’s detainment.

“An incumbent president cannot be prosecuted for abuse of power,” the lawyer said. “Of course, there are differing academic opinions on whether a president can be investigated for abuse of power and some assert that investigations are possible. But even when investigations are allowed, the prevailing opinion is that they should be exercised with the utmost restraint.”

The anti-corruption agency didn’t immediately respond to the lawyer’s comments.

Han Min-soo, spokesperson of the liberal opposition Democratic Party, called for the court to issue the warrant, saying Yoon Suk Yeol’s detainment would be the first step toward “ending the rebellion and restoring normalcy.”

The warrant request came after Yoon dodged several requests by the joint investigation team and public prosecutors to appear for questioning and also blocked searches of his offices.

While Yoon has the presidential privilege of immunity from criminal prosecution, such protections don’t extend to allegations of rebellion or treason.

It’s not clear whether the court will grant the warrant or whether Yoon can be compelled to appear for questioning.

Under the country’s laws, locations potentially linked to military secrets cannot be seized or searched without the consent of the person in charge, and it’s unlikely that Yoon will voluntarily leave his residence if he faces detention. There are also concerns about possible clashes with Yoon’s presidential security service if authorities attempt to forcibly detain him.

Yoon’s presidential powers were suspended after the National Assembly voted to impeach him on Dec. 14 over his imposition of martial law, which lasted only hours but has triggered weeks of political turmoil, halted high-level diplomacy and rattled financial markets.

Yoon’s fate now lies with the Constitutional Court, which has begun deliberations on whether to uphold the impeachment and formally remove Yoon from office or reinstate him.

The National Assembly voted last week to also impeach Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, who had assumed the role of acting president after Yoon’s powers were suspended, over his reluctance to fill three Constitutional Court vacancies ahead of the court’s review of Yoon’s case.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday Israel would continue acting against the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, whom he accused of threatening world shipping and the international order, and called on Israelis to be steadfast.

"Just as we acted forcefully against the terrorist arms of Iran's axis of evil, so we will act against the Houthis," he said in a video statement a day after a missile fired from Yemen fell in the Tel Aviv area, causing a number of mild injuries.

On Thursday, Israeli jets launched a series of strikes against energy and port infrastructure in Yemen in a move officials said was a response to hundreds of missile and drone attacks launched by the Houthis since the start of the Gaza war 14 months ago.

On Saturday, the U.S. military said it conducted precision airstrikes against a missile storage facility and a command-and-control facility operated by Houthis in Yemen's capital, Sanaa.

Netanyahu, strengthened at home by the Israeli military's campaign against Iran-backed Hezbollah forces in southern Lebanon and by its destruction of most of the Syrian army's strategic weapons, said Israel would act with the United States.

"Therefore, we will act with strength, determination and sophistication. I tell you that even if it takes time, the result will be the same," he said.

The Houthis have launched repeated attacks on international shipping in waters near Yemen since November 2023, in support of the Palestinians over Israel's war with Hamas.

South Korea’s opposition leader offered Sunday to work with the government to ease the political tumult as officials sought to reassure allies and markets, a day after the opposition-controlled parliament voted to impeach conservative President Yoon Suk Yeol over a short-lived attempt to impose martial law.

Liberal Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-myung, whose party holds a majority in the National Assembly, urged the Constitutional Court to rule swiftly on Yoon’s impeachment and proposed a special council for policy cooperation between the government and parliament.

Yoon’s powers have been suspended until the court decides whether to remove him from office or reinstate him. If Yoon is dismissed, a national election to choose his successor must be held within 60 days.

Lee, who has led a fierce political offensive against Yoon’s embattled government, is seen as the frontrunner to replace him. He lost the 2022 presidential election to Yoon by a razor-thin margin.

He told a televised news conference that a swift court ruling would be the only way to “minimize national confusion and the suffering of people.”

The court will meet to discuss the case Monday, and has up to 180 days to rule. But observers say that a court ruling could come faster. In the case of parliamentary impeachments of past presidents — Roh Moo-hyun in 2004 and Park Geun-hye in 2016 — the court spent 63 days and 91 days respectively before determining to reinstate Roh and dismiss Park.

Lee also proposed a national council where the government and the National Assembly would work together to stabilize state affairs, and said his party won’t seek to impeach Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, a Yoon appointee who’s now serving as acting president.

“The Democratic Party will actively cooperate with all parties to stabilize state affairs and restore international trust,” Lee said. “The National Assembly and government will work together to quickly resolve the crisis that has swept across the Republic of Korea.”

It’s unclear if Lee’s proposed council will be realized.

In a meeting with the parliament speaker, who touched upon Lee’s idea, Han said he will closely cooperate and communicate with the National Assembly but didn’t specifically say whether the government intends to join the council. Kweon Seong-dong, floor leader of the ruling People Power Party, separately criticized Lee’s proposal, saying that it’s “not right” for the opposition party acting like the ruling party.

Kweon, a Yoon loyalist, said that his party will use existing PPP-government dialogue channels “to continue to assume responsibility as the governing party until the end of President Yoon’s term.”

The Democratic Party has already used its parliamentary majority to impeach the justice minister and the chief of the national police over the martial law decree, and had previously said it was also considering impeaching the prime minister.

Upon assuming his role as acting leader, Han ordered the military to bolster its security posture to prevent North Korea from launching provocations. He also asked the foreign minister to inform other countries that South Korea’s major external policies will remain unchanged, and the finance minister to work to minimize potential negative impacts on the economy from the political turmoil.

On Sunday, Han had a phone call with U.S. President Joe Biden, discussing the political situation in South Korea and regional security challenges including North Korea’s nuclear program. Biden expressed his appreciation for the resiliency of democracy in South Korea and reaffirmed “the ironclad commitment” of the United States, according to both governments.

Yoon’s Dec. 3 imposition of martial law, the first of its kind in more than four decades, lasted only six hours, but has caused massive political tumult, halted diplomatic activities and rattled financial markets. Yoon was forced to lift his decree after parliament unanimously voted to overturn it.

Yoon sent hundreds of troops and police officers to the parliament in an effort to stop the vote, but they withdrew after the parliament rejected Yoon’s decree. No major violence occurred.

Opposition parties have accused Yoon of rebellion, saying a president in South Korea is allowed to declare martial law only during wartime or similar emergencies and would have no right to suspend parliament’s operations even in those cases.

Yoon has rejected the charges and vowed to “fight to the end.” He said the deployment of troops to parliament was aimed at issuing a warning to the Democratic Party, which he called an “anti-state force” that abused its control of parliament by holding up the government’s budget bill for next year and repeatedly pushing to impeach top officials.

Law enforcement institutions are investigating Yoon and others involved in the martial law case over possible rebellion and other allegations. They’ve arrested Yoon’s defense minister and police chief and two other high-level figures.

Yoon has immunity from most criminal prosecution as president, but that doesn’t extend to allegations of rebellion or treason. He’s been banned from leaving South Korea, but observers doubt that authorities will detain him because of the potential for clashes with his presidential security service.